¿influyen los determinantes socioeconómicos en la oferta de los menús escolares? / Do socioeconomic determinants influence school menus?

Introducción: la oferta de menús escolares es un área relevante en las estrategias de salud. Objetivos: analizar las diferencias en el cumplimiento de las frecuencias recomendadas de alimentos y otras características del comedor escolar en los centros educativos según su titularidad y la renta del barrio. Métodos: se ofreció la revisión trienal a los centros escolares de la ciudad de Barcelona que disponían de servicio de comedor. En los tres cursos académicos, participaron 341 centros: 175 públicos y 165 de titularidad privada. Para observar si existían diferencias, se utilizó la prueba de Pearson Chi-cuadrado o el test exacto de Fisher según el caso. Los análisis se realizaron con el programa estadístico STATA SE/15. Resultados: no se encontraron diferencias significativas según el nivel socioeconómico del barrio del centro educativo. Los centros educativos privados y concertados presentaban un menor cumplimiento en la pasta (11,1 %), las carnes rojas y procesadas (24,7 %), la carne total (7,4 %) y la fruta fresca (12,1 %), así como un menor uso del aceite recomendado para cocinar (13,1 %). Por el contrario, en los centros educativos públicos se observaba un menor cumplimiento en la recomendación del tipo de aceite para freír (16,9 %). Conclusiones: en los centros privados y concertados es necesario recomendar mejoras en la adecuación de las raciones. Se debería indagar en las causas que pueden explicar esta menor adecuación en varios aspectos como en el cumplimiento de las adecuaciones en estos centros.(AU)

Introduction: the components of school menus is an important area in health strategies.Objectives: the aim of this study was to analyse differences in adherence to recommended food frequencies and other characteristics of schoolmeals in educational centres according to the type of school and neighbourhood income.Method: schools in the city of Barcelona with a lunch service were offered a three-year review. In the three academic years, 341 schoolsparticipated: 175 were public and 165 were private. To identify any differences, the Pearson Chi-squared test or Fisher exact test were used, asappropriate. Statistical analyses were performed with the STATA SE/15 programme.Results: no statistically significant differences were found by the socioeconomic level of the school neighbourhood. Private and subsidisedschools showed lower adherence to recommendations on pasta (11.1 %), red and processed meat (24.7 %), total meat (7.4 %) and fresh fruit(12.1 %), and lower use of the recommended cooking oil (13.1 %). In contrast, public schools showed lower adherence to the recommendedtype of frying oil (16.9 %).Conclusions: in private and subsidised schools, improvements should be recommended on the frequency of intake of certain foods. Futurestudies should examine the causes of lower adherence to certain recommendations in these centres.(AU)

[Do socioeconomic determinants influence school menus?] / ¿Influyen los determinantes socioeconómicos en la oferta de los menús escolares?

Introduction: Introduction: the components of school menus is an important area in health strategies. Objectives: the aim of this study was to analyse differences in adherence to recommended food frequencies and other characteristics of school meals in educational centres according to the type of school and neighbourhood income. Method: schools in the city of Barcelona with a lunch service were offered a three-year review. In the three academic years, 341 schools participated: 175 were public and 165 were private. To identify any differences, the Pearson Chi-squared test or Fisher exact test were used, as appropriate. Statistical analyses were performed with the STATA SE/15 programme. Results: no statistically significant differences were found by the socioeconomic level of the school neighbourhood. Private and subsidised schools showed lower adherence to recommendations on pasta (11.1 %), red and processed meat (24.7 %), total meat (7.4 %) and fresh fruit (12.1 %), and lower use of the recommended cooking oil (13.1 %). In contrast, public schools showed lower adherence to the recommended type of frying oil (16.9 %). Conclusions: in private and subsidised schools, improvements should be recommended on the frequency of intake of certain foods. Future studies should examine the causes of lower adherence to certain recommendations in these centres.

Introducción: Introducción: la oferta de menús escolares es un área relevante en las estrategias de salud. Objetivos: analizar las diferencias en el cumplimiento de las frecuencias recomendadas de alimentos y otras características del comedor escolar en los centros educativos según su titularidad y la renta del barrio. Métodos: se ofreció la revisión trienal a los centros escolares de la ciudad de Barcelona que disponían de servicio de comedor. En los tres cursos académicos, participaron 341 centros: 175 públicos y 165 de titularidad privada. Para observar si existían diferencias, se utilizó la prueba de Pearson Chi-cuadrado o el test exacto de Fisher según el caso. Los análisis se realizaron con el programa estadístico STATA SE/15. Resultados: no se encontraron diferencias significativas según el nivel socioeconómico del barrio del centro educativo. Los centros educativos privados y concertados presentaban un menor cumplimiento en la pasta (11,1 %), las carnes rojas y procesadas (24,7 %), la carne total (7,4 %) y la fruta fresca (12,1 %), así como un menor uso del aceite recomendado para cocinar (13,1 %). Por el contrario, en los centros educativos públicos se observaba un menor cumplimiento en la recomendación del tipo de aceite para freír (16,9 %). Conclusiones: en los centros privados y concertados es necesario recomendar mejoras en la adecuación de las raciones. Se debería indagar en las causas que pueden explicar esta menor adecuación en varios aspectos como en el cumplimiento de las adecuaciones en estos centros.

School Menu Review Programme (PReME): evaluation of compliance with dietary recommendations during the period 2006-2020 in Catalonia.

BACKGROUND: The School Menu Review Programme (PReME) has been offering complimentary revisions of meal plans to all schools in Catalonia since 2006. This study aims to assess the evolution of compliance with PReME's recommendations in the meals provided by school cafeterias in Catalonia during the period 2006-2020. METHODS: Pre-post study with a sample of 6,387 meal plans from 2221 schools assessed during the period. The information was collected mainly by public health specialists within the annual technical and sanitary inspection of school kitchens and cafeterias. Meal plans were evaluated by Dietitian-Nutritionists team according to the criteria of the National Health System's "Consensus document on nutrition in schools" and the Public Health Agency of Catalonia's current guide "Healthy eating at school". Reports were sent to each participating school. A few months later, a new meal plan and another questionnaire were collected and evaluated in comparison with the first meal plan. Compliance with the recommendations was analysed based on the type of canteen management and the school category. RESULTS: Compliance improved during the study period. The percentage of schools that complied with dietary recommendations in relation to the five PReME indicators (fresh fruit, pulses, daily vegetables, fresh food and olive oil for dressing) has steadily increased since PReME began, (over 70% in all indictors; p = < 0.001), with variations depending on school category and cafeteria management. Furthermore, an improvement in the levels of compliance with de recommended food frequencies was observed. with statistically significant differences for all items (p < 0.001), except for pulses whose compliance had been high since the beginning of the study (p = 0.216). CONCLUSIONS: The positive evolution in compliance with PReME's recommendations provides evidence of the programme's effectiveness, with an improvement in the quality of school meals delivered in Catalonia.

Comedores escolares: Adherencia a las recomendaciones alimentarias de los menús escolares en Osona, Cataluña / School canteens: Adherence to the food recommendations of school menus in Osona

Fundamentos: Determinar la adherencia a las recomendaciones alimentarias de los menús en los centros deeducación primaria de Osona (Cataluña) y la satisfacción de los comensales con el servicio de comedor.Métodos: Estudio transversal en 29 centros. Participaron 420 niños/as (10-11años) usuarios del comedor. Seutilizaron datos del Programa de Revisión de Menús Escolares (PReME) de Cataluña para valorar la adherenciaa las recomendaciones de los menús, y se recogió la satisfacción de los comensales según el tipo de comedor.Se utilizó el software SPSS para las pruebas estadísticas.Resultados: 91,4% de los participantes utilizaban habitualmente el servicio de comedor. Se evidencia unacorrecta adherencia a las frecuencias de consumo de algunos alimentos, con la excepción de la pasta, huevos,ensalada, y fruta, siendo inferiores a las recomendaciones. Existe mayor oferta de legumbres en centros concocina propia. La satisfacción global con el comedor era mayor en los centros con cocina propia.Conclusiones: Los comedores escolares son un entorno adecuado para fomentar hábitos alimenticios. EnOsona estos servicios cumplen cada vez más con las recomendaciones alimentarias, aunque es necesariomejorar algunos aspectos. Se observa más satisfacción con los servicios de comedor con cocina propia, peroes necesario identificar variables concretas que expliquen esta satisfacción. (AU)

Background: To determine both school menus’ adherence to the dietary recommendations in centres ofprimary education of the Osona region (Catalonia), and the satisfaction of the diners with the school canteenservice.Methods: Cross-sectional study in 29 randomized schools of Osona. Participants: 420 children (aged 10-11yrs) who used school canteens. Data from the Catalonia’s School Menu Review Program (PReME) wereused to assess school menus’ adherence to the dietary recommendations, and the satisfaction of the dinersaccording to the type of dining service was collected. SPSS was used for statistical tests.Results: 91.4% participants used school canteens. There is a correct adherence to the consumptionfrequencies of some food groups, with the exception of pasta, eggs, salad, and fruit, which are lower thanrecommended. There is a greater supply of vegetables in the centres with a kitchen. Overall satisfaction withthe canteen was higher in the centres with a kitchen.Conclusions: School canteens are a suitable environment to promote eating habits. In Osona, these servicesincreasingly comply with dietary recommendations, although some aspects need to be improved. Participantsshow more satisfaction with the canteen that have a kitchen, but it is necessary to identify variables thatexplain this satisfaction. (AU)